Description: Woman goes to look for her daughter, within the strange desolate town called Silent Hill. Based on the video game. Review: I'm not sure what the original comment, withdrawing saw last night, but it certainly was not Silent Hill.I was a critical examination of the previous night, and GA are sure that I am very impressed. How to make games, and everything connected with them, my faith firmly established in Gans and Avery, and I can only wish sequels.The atmosphere was perfect, the action was at the time incredible creatures, and although the city was like in the city increïble.El if we love, and it's almost like coming home again. You'll see what I mean when I finally get to see film.Just be prepared for a disturbing, bloody (oh man, blood) and ride.Id really creepy to say more, but it would be like giving spoilers slaps in the face. Go see it!
Year: 2005 Genre: Crime, Thriller Director: Frank Miller Starring: Jessica Alba, Clive Owen, Mickey Rourke
Description: A film that explores the dark and miserable town Basin City and tells the story of three different people, all caught violent corruption. Review: With Hellboy, Guillermo Del Toro to love again sheet from artist / comic story creator Mike Mignola and put them into a busy life, a goal New standards for respectful adaptation, their material resources. With Sin City, but co-directed by Robert Rodriguez and Frank Miller did more than just brutal chiaroscuro again in Millers markedly postmodern noir artwork, theyve held capturing the essence and aesthetic city basin (as many characters as Marv or Hartigan) and bring the stunning three-dimensional cosmic character of his life. And unlike Hellboy, who is one, confusing weak script, Sin City Pulp Fiction-style woven narrative, which snakes through the dark alleys and winding road of hell urban areas, such as fever dream.In short Sin City Ballet brings sharp bullets and blood, dames and danger at every turn. His work of pop culture for the new millennium (and the specific case, it is a film for the CGI was invented) . As a fan of Frank Miller's more than 25 years, I know my job and I know that Sin City? Sin City and it will knock your socks off if you are a fan, a newcomer to the dark pleasures of the imagination of his evil personality and style , ch brutal. Exceeded my expectations on all levels, this film ranks as one of the most exciting experiences of cinema is going Ive years.Everything m work here. The film Rodriguezs adjust the direction and smooth (not small when you consider along with director Quentin Tarantino and Robert Miller participated as a director mixture special guests), and on the site, for casting. The script for Bruce Willis, Mickey Rourke, Clive Owen and Benicio Del Toro are plenty of opportunities to chew the country? and especially Rourke, who despite his mug buried under a layer of rubber awful, bringing one of the best performances in his career and stole the show as Marv, giant thug with a broken heart. Women hold their own, too. Jessica Alba, Rosario Dawson, Jaime King and Brittany Murphy are excellent in their roles, especially Dawson as a gun-toting dominatrix / prostitute, her progress Gail started. A Glory Elijah Wood (proof that there is life after the Hobbit) and Nick Stahl, which provide contrasting performances as the evil villain, incredibly Kevin and shit scared yucky yellow, respectively. Sin City is a sleek, stylish, sexy and sick. It also violent and fun. Definitely not a movie for the whole family, but also for those of us with our movie rated R, movie This early rock and gut as mule.Heres hope that Sin City is mint, because 10,000 stories naked (sin) city, and it is only a handful of them. Im prayed sequel.A picture perfect ten for this CineAsia.
Year: 2012 Genre: Comedy Director: Larry Charles Starring: Sacha Baron Cohen, Ben Kingsley, Anna Faris
Description: The heroic story of a dictator who risks his life to democracy would never come to the country he so lovingly oppressed.The heroic story of a dictator who risks his life to democracy would never come to the country he so lovingly oppressed. Review: I usually avoid movies I know will be obvious and crude humor it just is not my cup of tea. So immediately I was expecting this movie is pretty terrible ... I do not know if it was my low expectations for the test, but I really like this picture very much. To enjoy this film, however, you have to separate yourself from thinking a little too much money from kyntha, ttahatari and crude humor in the movie. Anyway, satire of dictatorship, it is a movie making fun of the real world, and if you let it be, it makes you realize out (but smiling) think about racism and prejudices of ordinary people every day. Yes, it is a strange and obviously their situation, but in general, I think it is material, it is very funny. Set Victorian influence on your night and have a good laugh. Watch it.
Year: 2012 Genre: Drama Director: David Chase Starring: John Magaro, Jack Huston, Will Brill
Description: Seen in suburban New Jersey in 1960, a group of friends form a rock band and try to make it big. Review: Reading some of the other reviews I see something positive interpretation of this movie: Life as a young person of 60 was consistent and predictable so perfect for this film needs to be replaced. The problem is that they are more or less instantaneous random life that illustrate decade in ways we already understand: I love the Beatles, I'm sad and upset when MLK was their shot himself, I'm not going to support or conspiracy Nam.Vithout structured character development, it is anticipated all void. Too much or are planted in one and all die, drowning in filth unstable. Finally, the individual scenes are executed in a manner that is floral, chatty and predictable, which leaves every self-indulgent attempt to evoke emotions very clearly. Nostalgia is powerful, and some fever-down-spine-time undoubtedly will occur, making it easy to overestimate this film. However, these moments happen * future * Film: cold history and good music are powerful things.
Year: 2012 Genre: Action, Crime, Mystery Director: Daniel Espinosa Starring: Denzel Washington, Ryan Reynolds, Vera Farmiga
Description: Young CIA agent responsible for looking after a fugitive shelter. But when the safe house attacked, he finds himself run tasuta.Young CIA agent responsible for looking after a fugitive shelter. But when the safe house attacked, he finds himself a free run. Review: Ill be honest. When I saw the trailer, I'm crazy excited. It looked fantastic. But then, after a while, I remember that the main point of the trailer is to do just that. Hype of the movie, and it literally all the major plot scenes and parts. I do not know if it happened in the Safe House, because, hey, Denzel Washington. That man does not make role.I just returned from the film, and I am glad that I was wrong. This film is brilliant, electrifying. Know that I just do not get anything out of an action movie. In most cases, I just watch and forget. It is really fantastic. I do not have one bad word to say about the way it was designed for, do, or something. Everything is just fantastic.I understand my words sound absurd, and the score will look the same, but totally worth it. I do not see an action movie is well written, and it also serves as a very, very long time. Of course, at the end of the film, which is an experienced observer to know the end of the story itself, but even if you get it, it's still very enjoyable to sit through and see how the pieces connect.I really hate long reviews, so I'm to try to make this short and to the point as possible. Finally, it should be noted that none of his role as a member of the cast will fail. Ryan is great, even better then i couldve imagined (which was a good acting skills after Green Lantern and the Change-Up), and Denzel, what to say that has not already been said a man acting. Phenomenal does not cut it.Go and see. Which is much better then anything else thats airing.
Description: 1921 England is overwhelmed by the loss and grief of World War Hoax exhibitor Florence Cathcart visits a boarding school to explain sightings of a spirit child. All she thinks that unravels as the missing begin to show. Review: 1914-1919, in millions of people died from the flu. The company did not know then. Science storyline rational thought is not, then force today. People are open to anything, including the ability ghosts.Florence Cathcart (Rebecca Hall) is in London, in the twenties, as a free-plot revealing the supernatural. Boarding school teacher (Dominic West), asking him to visit the school after the death of the student, where unexplained observations have been reported. Florence is not a complete skeptic. It leaves much to blow that made me mention it agnostic to the ghosts. In fact, two stories. One of the most disturbing death of a student. Other more interesting and sets him apart from the flood of other horror films crazy as quickly as ghostly visions in them. It focuses on Florence itself, and I will not say because I do not spoil it for you.This is not a terrible movie, a few signs but little monster. But what a lot of uncertainty. Nick Murphy, in his feature-length debut is capable of supporting grief, it is important for the story. It is not surprising that Rebecca, the daughter of Peter Hall, founder of the Royal Shakespeare Company. It is used to control the way that made many of his peers blush with envy. Her character is difficult to imagine. Dominic West, who was a pioneer in the crime series The Wire, is very good, because guilt the victim monkey soldiers, who became a teacher. Imelda Staunton as effectively as the school matron. He looks into your eyes, trying to tell you something. Im calling it a film for adults, because it adds a spiritual element. Misdemeanors story relate to the theme of privacy give leadership. Murphy visual acuity reduced to a Ghost Story? Otherwise, it would be wrong for another cooling off period? and focuses on the history contained emotions. The result is a smart and original. The penultimate revelation would be a great ending to her, which makes it a double-bolt impressive.www.moseleyb13.com
Year: 2012 Genre: Action Director: Dan Bradley Starring: Chris Hemsworth, Josh Peck, Josh Hutcherson
Description: Group of young people look to save their town from an invasion of North Korean soldiers. Review: Honestly you are better off going to see North Korea as this poor excuse of film. Honestly, I wish N. Korea would attack us just so they could stop the distribution of this terrible movie. It is a shame that this film was made in Michigan, not just a boost for our representatives. I have no idea why they chose Josh Peck for one of the male leads. He Hayden Christiansen look like Marlon Brando in his prime. Now that I think about it, I could even see a plug, the new dawn this place. I know that nothing special, but believe me it really is that bad. It makes sense, too, that this was recorded in 2009 and again just now published. In retrospect, the studio should've just cut losses and doses of this thing for good. The only positive is maybe it will lead people to the original movie from the 80's, the watch actually watchable.
Description: Malcolm and I had to go to their dream home, but soon learn a devil also staying there. When I had gone mad, Malcolm - decided to keep their sex life right track - beat a priest, a psychic, and a team of ghost-busters to help. Review: Lets get this right now: I appreciate good movies. Was it a good movie? No, it was actually pretty stupid. Will people hate it? Definitely. Did I enjoy it? A lot. I do not know what it was about this movie, but sometimes I could not help but laugh. In my head I knew it was stupid, but I just do not care. Its immature, raunchy and ridiculous, but I loved it. The only Marlon Wayans movies I like, along with this, the first Scary Movie and White Chicks. All three of them were pretty stupid. But thats the point. Sometimes you just have to see the movie, which is obviously not good, but will entertain you. I love good, well-made film as much as the next guy, but I also just relax and watch a movie that will keep me smiling for 90-120 minutes. So if you are tired, have $ 7 - $ 10, and an hour and a half to burn, watch this movie.
Year: 1960 Genre: Horror, Mystery, Thriller Director: Alfred Hitchcock Starring: Anthony Perkins, Vera Miles, John Gavin
Description: A thirty-something secretary stole $ 40,000 from his employer clients, and then met with a young motel proprietor too long under the domination of his mother. Review: Yes, everything you've heard is true. The score is a part of pop culture. The internal conflict is well known. But nothing like the experience itself.If shock has not seen this movie, do yourself a favor. Stop HSE read reviews, get up, take a shower before going for this movie. Buy, do not rent. You will not regret it.Psycho easily the best horror thrillers of all time. Nothing approaching you ... Perhaps Diaboliques (1955), but really.Psycho one of the best scripts ever find in a movie. The films only flaw is that the characters seem to have little incentive in the first act of the film, but as the story progresses, you realize that Hitchcock (Genius Genius! Genius!) In strôco genius has done this on purpose, because the other character motives are even more important. Vital. So important to completely forget everything else. I was lucky to have spent my life wisely avoided talking about the plot of this film until I had the opportunity to see it in its entirety. Thankfully, for free! The film argues that the midpoint of the best plot twists and climatic history is exciting, and certainly more re expires. The latest pictures and cool in the sights of terror persistent mind.Just writing is so good Hitchcock reference, which is so excellent that explanation is varied presence. Suffice to say that this film is probably the best film director best director HISTORY effort. I was lucky enough to see this film in a big house in the regeneration oldTime Hitchcock film. Janet Leigh spoke, still beaming, before the film and explained how the genius of Hitchcock in its ability to 1) scare bloodless and 2) leaves his indelible mark on the movie , calculates shadow actors are not (like the famous Renoir could never do). Psycho is evident in his own phenomenon, despite all the big names in talent involved.Hitchcock not disappoint him out in his characteristic black humor. Its brightness is the most important, scary and fun at the same time. When I saw the theater the audience gasping in disbelief when laughing.One else falls on the ground ... Tony Perkins. Janet Leigh earned well-deserved praise for this film, but Perkins who gives what remains the best single performance by an actor in a horror film. Underestimated going into their luster. It becomes a character. The brightness full paper is a proof of the ineptitude of the actors in Gus Van Sants 1998 (God did it stop!) Redo shot for shot. Although the films are almost identical, Hitchcock better mainly because of the action and atmosphere (some creepiness is lost with the color). This makes clear the initial conversation between the character and Leighs Perkins, key scenes. The brilliance of the original brightness Perkins even brighter compared to the ruin of the new version, but the words and images are exactly the same. Chemistry is essential at this stage to keep missing the remake even went to our understanding of upcoming events. The fact that Perkins is no exception to this role - his star stops rising star as he had done in 50 years - shows that can play a very well.I use big words, but I can not hide my enthusiasm for the film. It is completely different Overbudget exaggerated hair too long, throwing all-too-often outside Hollywood today. Psycho is a simple, well-made and only the location length.Eleven-and-a-half out of ten stars.
Year: 2012 Genre: Drama Director: Paul Thomas Anderson Starring: Joaquin Phoenix, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Amy Adams
Description: A Navy veteran arrives home from war unsettled and uncertain about his future until he is tantalized by the cause and its charismatic leader. Review: I was fortunate to see this film earlier than most. To me, it looks like Anderson really hit their stride with this. It was strange to me that when the student theater, is what I wonder about most of all what the hell is he gonna do next! The Master is not an easy film to sit through, and sometimes you do not even know what the movie does. But then you realize that the movie does not mean anything. All it takes is for you to observe. More so than his previous films, the master and there will be blood really venture into the realm of film as a purely cinematic presentation of a lifetime. Anderson did not pass any judgment or point of view, stretch it simply fabric that allows his character to speak for themselves. Yes, it is a beginning, middle and end of one, but is it? we really have a sense of renewal at the end there will be blood? or we simply understand a little better? Anderson insisted he said, so Im sure it would say the same thing about this film, which will have been without a metaphor for anything. It was what it was. No mystery, no subtitle sophisticated and often formulated. People read simply. As Hoffman's character says in the trailer for the Master - But above all, I am a man.The film is an idea of ​​the interesting leader in the account master soldier, vs. slavery. It breaks down the anatomy of a relationship that you can interpret his words in any way youd like.Its beautifully shot on 65/70mm film that is as I see it and how I record pray for you see it if you get a chance. Feeling almost like Anderson, giving the finger to the digital revolution by shooting the film on a resolution so high that digital can only dream of getting it in about ten years or jump. The acting and dialogue are superb as you'd expect. Phoenix and Hoffman is on another level here, especially in Phoenix a role of a lifetime. There are definitely occasions in this film as it disappeared into the role. There are also some great supporting work from Laura Dern and others.It would be hard to put this film on his work. More than anything, it feels like a natural continuation of what he started with, it becomes blood. Not to say that it continues on this path, but just that it's definitely a movie more focused than some of the earlier work with him. I found it to be less engaging than some of the work lotl, and again there was never a dull moment. You're always on your toes, try to understand what is happening and where the film leads you. It's really simple, just like humans, a fascinating work.
8 
1
